Gretchen Morgenson, the current dean of financial reporting, covers the DPS pension debate as part of a series on private and public debt. This particular political pigskin has been kicked enough to shame Jason Elam, but I’m glad it is getting more attention, because the critical issue — underfunded pensions — is not going away on an election cycle.
Why do I think the critical issue is underfunded pensions and not any specific financing? Well, follow the money.
First, here is the part of the article I think most parties will gloss over while trying to estimate their political pundit hang time:
While it is possible that the annual costs of the Denver deal will come down in the future, they are now roughly in line with what the school system would have paid in a fixed-rate transaction.
Let me paraphrase: right now it’s a wash, and there is some chance costs will decline. The district has not lost money as a result of the transaction, and may still benefit. So the first number is currently pretty close to zero.
What’s the other number? Well, as of a year ago, PERA was underfunded by an estimated $27.5 billion (yes, that is a “b”). I’ll try to find the 2010 estimate, but I have not yet seen it published. But for fun, let’s round down to, oh, $25 billion.
Now, anyone care to argue that zero is a bigger problem than, say, $25 billion?